The piggyback mechanism was already in place in the early days of Checkmk — as a part of the monitoring of VMware. Here is a situation in which data needs to be queried from a particular host because the data is located only on that host (for example, from an ESX host system or the vCenter), but in the monitoring the data relates to a completely different host (a virtual machine for example).
This cannot be realized with the normal mechanism in Checkmk because this automatically assigns data and services that it fetches from a host. It would also be very impractical for the operation if all information for all VMs always appeared directly at the ESX host or even the vCenter.
The term ‘piggyback’ describes the process by which monitoring data for host B is piggybacked (so to speak) with the data queried from host A.
These days piggyback is used in many other monitoring plug-ins, e.g. in monitoring AWS, Azure, Kubernetes, or Docker. It is also very easy to use the piggyback mechanism yourself if you want to implement your own check plug-ins in which you want to transfer data from one source to any other host(s).
2. The Piggyback principle
The basic principle of piggyback works as shown in the following diagram. Host A not only has its own monitoring data, but also that from other hosts — or more generally from other objects. For example, an ESX host records the state and many current metrics for each of its VMs. This host A is sometimes referred to as the source host in this context.
If Checkmk now retrieves the monitoring data from A in its regular one-minute intervals — be it from the normal Checkmk agent or from a special agent via a manufacturer’s API — in the response it also receives specially-marked reporting data from the other hosts/objects B, C, and so on. This piggyback data is then placed in files on the Checkmk server for later processing. The hosts B, C, and so on are referred to as Piggybacked Hosts.
If Checkmk later requires the monitoring data from B or C, they are already in the local files and can be processed directly without having to query an agent:
It is also possible and useful to combine normal monitoring and piggyback. Let’s take the example of VMware again: You may have installed a Checkmk agent in your VM B which evaluates local information from the VM that is not known to the ESX host (e.g., processes running in the VM). In this case not only will the agent be queried, but its data will also be combined with the piggyback data received from host A:
3. Piggyback in practice
3.1. Setting up piggyback
First the good news — The piggyback mechanism works completely automatically: * If piggyback data for other hosts is detected when querying A they are automatically saved for later evaluation. * If piggyback data from another host is found when querying B it will be used automatically.
However — as usual in Checkmk — everything is configurable. Namely, in the properties of a host (such as host _B _) in the Data Sources box you can set how it should react to existing or missing piggyback data:
The default is Use piggyback data from other hosts if present. If available, piggyback data is used, and if none is there the host just uses its ‘own’ monitoring data.
With the Always use and expect piggback data setting you force the processing of piggyback data. If the data is missing or outdated the Check_MK service will issue a warning.
And with Never use piggyback data any piggyback data found is simply ignored — a setting that you’ll only need in exceptional cases.
3.2. Hosts must be present
Of course for a host to process piggyback data the host itself must be present in the monitoring. In the example of ESX this means that you must also have your VMs as hosts in Checkmk so that they are actually monitored.
Starting with Version 1.6.0 of the Enterprise Editions, using the dynamic configuration you can also automate this and automatically create hosts for which piggback data is available.
3.3. Hostnames and their assignments
In the above schemes it was somehow logical that the data from object B was assigned to host B in the monitoring. But what exactly is B?
With the piggyback mechanism the assignment always uses a name. The (special) agent writes an object name for each set of piggyback data. In the case of ESX, e.g. the name of the virtual machine. Some plug-ins — such as docker — also have several options for what should be used as a name.
For the mapping to work correctly, the name of the matching host in Checkmk must of course be identical — including upper and lower case.
But what happens if the names of objects in the piggyback data are inappropriate or undesirable for monitoring? There is the special Access to Agents > General Settings > Hostname translation for piggybacked hosts rule set for such situations.
To configure a rename you need to do two things:
Create a rule in this rule chain and set the condition to access the source host – ie. host A.
Create a suitable name assignment value in the rule.
Here is an example of the value in a rule.
Two things are configured: first, all host names from the piggyback data are
converted to lowercase letters.
Then the two hosts
vm0816 are also converted to the
More flexible is the method using regular expressions found under Multiple regular expressions. This is useful if the renaming of many hosts is necessary, and it is done according to a specific scheme. Proceed as follows:
Activate the Multiple regular expressions option.
Add a translation entry with the Add expression button — two fields will appear.
In the first field — Regular expression — enter a regular expression that matches the original object name and which contains at least one subgroup – that is, a subexpression enclosed in parentheses. For a good explanation of these groups see the article on regular expressions.
In Replacement specify a schema for the desired target host name in which the values that were ‘trapped’ with the subgroups will be replaced by
An example of a regular expression would be, for example
The substitute value
myvm\1 would then translate the name
4. The technology behind this process
4.1. Transport of the piggyback data
As described above the piggyback data is also transported to other hosts with the agent output from the ‘source host’. The output from the Checkmk agent is a simple text-based format which is shown in the article on monitoring agents.
What’s new is that a line is allowed in the output that starts with
<<<< and ends with
In between is a hostname. All further monitoring data starting from this line is
then assigned to this host.
Here is an example excerpt that assigns the section
<[esx_vsphere_vm]> to the host
<<<<316-VM-MGM>>>> <<<esx_vsphere_vm>>> config.datastoreUrl url /vmfs/volumes/55b643e1-3f344a10-68eb-90b11c00ff94|uncommitted 12472944334|name EQLSAS-DS-04|type VMFS|accessible true|capacity 1099243192320|freeSpace 620699320320 config.hardware.memoryMB 4096 config.hardware.numCPU 2 config.hardware.numCoresPerSocket 2 guest.toolsVersion 9537 guest.toolsVersionStatus guestToolsCurrent guestHeartbeatStatus green name 316-VM-MGM
A line with the content
<<<<>>>> can be used to
end this assignment. Any further output then belongs again to the source host.
When processing the agent output CMK extracts the parts intended for other hosts
and places them in files under
Below this is a subdirectory for each target host
(for example, for each VM) — that is if we stick to our example with the
In this subdirectory there will then be a separate file with the actual data
from each source host. Their names would be
A in our example.
Why is this so complicated? Well — one host can indeed get piggyback data from
multiple hosts, so a single file would not be enough.
Tip: If you are curious about what the piggyback data looks like,
look up the agent output from your monitoring instance’s hosts in the
tmp/check_mk/cache directory. An overview of all involved files and
directories can be found below.
4.2. Orphaned piggyback data
If you cannot or do not want to use the dynamic host configuration, you may receive piggyback data from a host that you have not even created in Checkmk. This may be intentional, but it may also be an error — e.g. because a name is not an exact match.
In the ‘Treasures’ section you will find a script called
find_piggy_orphans with which your Checkmk can search for piggyback data
for which there is no host in monitoring.
Simply call this script without any arguments.
The script will output a list with one line — sorted by name - for each
non-monitored piggy-host found:
share/doc/check_mk/treasures/find_piggy_orphans fooVM01 barVM02
This output is ‘clean’ and can, for example, be processed in a script.
4.3. Piggyback in distributed environments
Please note that in distributed environments the
current situation is that the source host and the piggybacked hosts must be
monitored in the same instance. This is simply because — for efficiency
reasons — the transmission of data between the hosts is done by using local
file exchange running via the
Future versions of Checkmk may provide a mechanism allowing the optional transmission of piggyback data across instance boundaries.
5. Files and directories
5.1. File paths on the Checkmk server
Storage location for piggyback data
Directory for piggyback data for Host B
File with piggyback data from Host A for Host B
Meta information for the hosts creating piggyback data
Agent output from Host A — including any existing piggyback data in a raw-format